Why Does TiVo Need Permission To Innovate?
from the bad-precedent... dept
A couple weeks ago, we had the story of the MPAA and the NFL trying to force TiVo to stop its plans to add new features to their devices that would let a user send a recorded program to another device. While we discussed why this was a ridiculous move by both the MPAA and the NFL, a reporter at the Washington Post is now going one step further and pointing out that the real travesty is the fact that TiVo suddenly needs to ask permission from the government to innovate. The ability of companies to continually innovate and reinvent markets based on free and open competition is what helps drive this economy. When companies need to ask permission to add innovative features, and that permission needs to go through other companies, we're destroying our ability to innovate competitively. Instead, companies outside of this country will build new systems with features that consumers actually want, while systems here are held back by regulations that serve no other purpose than to protect an adjacent industry that refuses to change with the times. It's the worst form of protectionism -- since no one will even admit that it's protectionism. And, like all attempts at protectionism, the end result will be much worse for those these rules supposedly protect.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
tvo innovation
The software industry has been very good about making it difficult to make unauthorized copies of its software. It has not put the same effort into preventing of coping products it doesn't create i.e. music, video TV programs etc. In fact the software people seem to be working to simplify the copying of products it doesn't create. Which to me is very two faced and saying that there is one set of rules for us and another set of rules for everyone else.
If TVO creats this innovation should everyone have the right to copy it and use it for free? Or should others have to pay TVO for the right to use its innovation?
If one elimiates copyright and patents then one totally stops major innovation because the creator could never profit from the invention.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: tvo innovation
The difference here and your description involving Microsoft is that this isn't a situation where people are saying football must be protected, but they're saying that TIVO must be the one to do the protecting, rather than Football itself.
So the analogy isn't that Microsoft would need to create software that would prevent its OS from being offered, but that Dell and IBM and every computer maker would have to create that software on their own, and then submit it to Microsoft for approval -- despite it not being their issue, but Microsofts.
Finally, the claim that "the creator could never profit from the invention" is simply false. It just means that the creator needs to be more creative about their business models. The fact that you can't think of such a business model is your problem. If you read this site regularly, you would know that we've pointed to many business models that make perfect sense (and money) without having to rely on intellectual property laws. It's a business question, not a legal one. Making it a legal one stymies innovation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why Does TiVo Need Permission To Innovate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]