Missing Top Secret Disks Actually Just A Computer Bug
from the whoooops dept
Remember those well publicized "missing" top secret hard drives from Los Alamos? The same missing drives that had the FBI threatening to arrest a novelty store owner? Turns out they might not have been missing after all. In fact, the entire mess is being chalked up to a computer glitch in their inventory system that declared a "false positive" suggesting the drivers were missing when they weren't. You would think, given the seriousness of such a situation that any inventory system would have some sort of immediate manual method for checking on the actual drives the second the system sounds the "uh oh, something's missing" alarm. Apparently not. Of course, this brings up the second question. If the drives have really been safely at home this whole time, why didn't anyone bother to check there in the first place?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
What about scary false negatives?
Of course, there are now a href = "http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996239 ">new strains of HIV that are not detected by existing tests either.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What about scary false negatives?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
serial numbers?
It sounds like the author of the article didn't bother asking any of these questions.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
think a little harder
It's the worst-case inventory problem -- how do you prove that something listed in your inventory records never existed?
The only thing you can complain about how the heck does a false record get accidentally created in the first place? Well, I'm sure with a little work you can figure out countless scenarios: software glitch, user clicking twice, etc.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]