Stupid PR Tricks, Part 4
from the two-for-one! dept
Here's the latest in our, irregular, but ongoing discussion of PR people not understanding blogs. First, we had PR people hired by companies to pitch them, but pretending to be totally unconnected to the companies they were bugging us about. Second, we had PR people submitting press releases when we clearly told them not to -- and, even worse, submitting press releases about things we would obviously never write about (something you would know if you looked at the site for more than, say, five seconds). Next, we had the PR spammer who emailed out 11 press releases, all written in capital letters, and had no return address on the emails. Today, yet another PR person who can't be bothered to read the site emailed us a press release this morning (again on a story we would never come close to posting -- no, we don't care that the tiny company you represent got named to some industry list). This time, however, the PR person had taken a word document with an old press release and just dumped in the new stuff while thinking she had deleted the old. She then let Word "save as HTML" and sent out the press release as an email. Unfortunately for her, I don't let my email client display HTML email, so what I got was nearly unreadable -- but just readable enough to note that when Word saves in HTML, apparently it includes all the changes. So from what I could see, I have a "mash up" of two press releases, complete with random strike-throughs and insertions, showing all of the edits made on the existing press release. So, for example, I can see that whereas they originally described the company's solution as "unique," that was later crossed out. Not that I would be writing about this announcement anyway, but now I'm left wondering what happened that this company's product is no longer "unique."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Stupid PR Tricks, Part 4
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PR and Press Release
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
yeah, a PR Losers List or something
Mike, it's apparent you need to make a Hall of Shame, and have some of these bad releases on there with some dissection.
Your readership needs it, man!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: yeah, a PR Losers List or something
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Out them
Why not just out the PR person, or the agency?
Yes, I am a PR person, and no, I'm not turning against my own. I am just looking at it as a way to help people learn a valuable lesson.
Just a thought....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Out them
Call it population control. Call it PR Darwinism -- point being, the better PR folk survived while the weaker ones vanished. And IÕd like to think that the media industry as a whole was better for it.
Now that weÕre seeing some economic recovery, itÕs discouraging to think that standards are dropping again, sloppiness is making a comeback and that shortcuts are Òin.Ó
[ link to this | view in chronology ]