WikiWiki Warfare In The Enterprise Leading To Situational Software?

from the the-right-platform? dept

With the launch of Joe Kraus and Graham Spencer's (two of the Excite founders) new startup, JotSpot, most of the attention is being paid to how it competes with SocialText, the original hosted enterprise wiki company. However, Business Week's coverage is a little more interesting. It's probably due to how JotSpot is trying to position themselves, but Business Week suggests that, rather than just being something of an open scratch pad, JotSpot lets people build their own software programs. This may seem silly at first. Indeed, it's clearly overstating the power of wikis right now, though it does show how JotSpot is positioning themselves against SocialText by clearly promoting add-on wiki components that look familiar to typical intranet/enterprise software users. However, the whole idea has me wondering if the wiki concept really could be the platform for situational software. Situational software is Clay Shirky's way of describing a new breed of quick-and-dirty software designed to solve a particular task for a small group of people, often built by non-programmers. We've already written about efforts by Charles Simonyi to create a platform for designing simple to use programming environments for non-programmers trying to solve specific tasks -- but perhaps the wiki is one step ahead of this. The problem, though, is that the wiki, by itself, has limited programmability. You can enter text and make links, but that's not quite the same as building an actual application. While both SocialText and JotSpot appear to offer additional components that they've built, the next stage may be for them to start promoting easy integration with additional outside apps and components developed by others. If you start thinking of the wiki as less an open whiteboard for text, and more an open workbench for integrating web services-based applications however you'd like, things start to get much more interesting.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Graham Spencer, 6 Oct 2004 @ 4:43pm

    Jot's applications

    One of the key features of JotSpot's platform is that all of the add-on applications are actually built inside the wiki using very simple markup. We don't want to be the ones writing the add-ons; the nature of situational software is that the user has to build it themselves because the software meets a need that is very specific to that user's circumstance. Since our apps are themselves pages in the wiki, we hope that users will find an app that's a little like something they need and then modify the app so it meets their need exactly.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Devboy00, 7 Oct 2004 @ 11:10am

    Re: Jot's applications

    This is all very well and good, but we've been doing this for the last three years. I'm not going to shamelessly plug our software, but if a beta site is getting press and an established one isn't, perhaps we should get a better marketing approach methinks.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Ludovic Dubost, 12 Oct 2004 @ 3:15pm

    Wikis can have programmability

    You say wikis have limited programmability.. Well that's exactly what JotSpot and XWiki (the open source project I'm working on) are trying to solve.. Allowing to easily add structured data and manipulate this data.. Adding external data is of course also an important objective

    See some demos of non traditional wiki features in XWiki:
    http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Demo/WebHome

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.