VoIP Guys Missing The Point
from the no,-no,-no... dept
While it's not a huge surprise, given their heritage and attempt to simply emulate the phone system in just about every way, it looks like the major VoIP players are making the same mistakes that many wireless carriers have been making. They're focused on controlling the experience. Now that they've convinced many people they can offer telephone-like service at cheap prices, they are now trying to focus on rolling out more advanced applications, so they can start upselling on features. The problem is, however, that (just like the mobile carriers) they somehow think that only they can design the right applications for a VoIP system. This means that a company like AT&T is working on, you guessed it, video calling over VoIP. Yes, video calling. The same thing that AT&T and others have been hyping for decades and which never catches on. There's no difference in doing video calling over a phone line or over VoIP, so why should it catch on now? The advantage that they have with VoIP is they can open it up, so that anyone can develop applications that work off the VoIP network. The old phone system had the applications centralized. VoIP systems don't need to have that limitation. They can pull applications from anywhere. That's where the disruption will occur. That's where the innovation will occur -- and that's where the money is.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
unknown.../////////////voiippi
[ link to this | view in thread ]
seen vs unseen
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The big issue with opening up the network
I am not saying I agree with them, Security through Obscurity rarely works in the long run. But that would be one obvious reason, why VOIP companies hesitate to open things up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I beg to differ
The *huge* difference is that every time they tried to do video calling in the past, there was no broadband involved. They tried to send voice and video over a dial up connection.
I doubt anyone is using a pay-service VOIP provider over a dial-up connection, that would be silly. It's relatively safe to assume that greater than 99% of your paying VOIP customers have a broadband connection - a connection that can handle real time video calls.
Now, as to whether or not you can actually make any money off of it, I guess we'll have to wait and see what the porn industry does with it - they are the world leaders in technology innovation, after all...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I beg to differ
But at home people generally like to relax when they are at home, they dont have to want to worry about what they look like someone calls them up. There is also the ongoing trend of cordless phones, which takes away that freedom of movement to stand in front of a camera. Some people just dont want other people to be able to see inside their houses. There are just soo many issues.
Though, im sure many of these issues could be addressed. The result is going to be something not quite as simple and convenient as purely voice only system.
Greg.
[ link to this | view in thread ]