Search Engines Are Parasites That Will Kill The Publishing Business?
from the um.--ok. dept
Search Engine Watch points to a recap of an Association of Online Publishers (AOP) conference last week where attendees were told that search engines were "parasites" that will kill all growth in the online publishing business. The reasoning isn't entirely clear. Basically, he believes that everyone is using search to start their news gathering, but that big publishers will be able to manipulate search to their advantage. It appears that someone from the Economist doesn't necessarily agree. He notes that Google is killing off the importance of brand in the publishing business, as people just accept the top results. Thus, some random blogger (the horror!) might get more attention than the Economist. Both of these speakers are wrong. First off, while there is some search engine manipulation, it's unlikely to be powerful enough to completely block out additional sources. Second, many people do still make use of brand and don't entirely rely on search to find their news. They may have a few sources they like and some random searches for other info -- but as more people learn not to trust a single source that actually helps brands that have built up some level of trust.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ever get the feeling they cant compete?
Using search to find news is a stretch unless you are looking for something not found readily on your news module, favorite site, etc.
I agree that Google is a biased search engine as they sell top spots, hence I merely dont use them.
All the hype over single search engines crack me up. I am waiting for the rest of the media to discover aggregate search tools like Copernic Pro, which has been around for several years and getting better all the time, which searches a dozen or so customizable engines, and then applies algorithms to determine the actual value of the content against the performed search. I always find immediately what I am looking for with this tool.
Anyway, there's my two cents worth...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The economist is correct
But what is The Economist's worried about? The charge per article on thier site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google and top spots
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What about RSS?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]