Voicemail? Who Uses Voicemail Any More?
from the so-last-millennium dept
Could it be that voicemail is going to become a cultural marker of a generation? Just 25 years after voicemail was invented, new studies suggest that kids have lost interest in it. Instead, they use SMS or IM to communicate if the person isn't available to talk via voice (and often, even if they are). The suggestion is that the younger generation doesn't believe in time shifting communication, but wants answers right away. In other words, they want synchronous communication, and realize that the tools given to them make that possible. Tools that delay communication, then, are of less interest. Anyone want to bet that this impacts email as well? So, perhaps a few years from now, people making use of voicemail will seem dated.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
So what?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
personally I hate VM
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Personal view point
On the other hand, with an email, I can get right to the heart of the message and if I have to review it, it's instant access. So much better than voice mail is or probably can every become (voice search and access is a ways away).
As far as Instant messaging, text messaging, etc, I've learned to hate it. The sender does expect an instant response and often, you don't want to 'talk' to that person ... isn't that what voice mail, and now email, is all about ? The facility to respond at your leisure, not the other persons ?
There's also a comfort and familiarity factor involved. I pretty much demand email for my correspondence from my colleagues and use it as my first and almost exclusive form of communicating with others. However, my department head is pretty much exclusively a phone and voice mail kinda guy. I know if I want to get his attention, a voice mail or message will find him much sooner than he will find the email.
Some of the phone services are starting to get this idea as well that many folks choose different forms of communication and they've started aggragating them such that you can get them and receive them all with your choice and not some one elses.
Communications: a professional occupation that will never die; only transform.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: personally I hate VM
I've never liked voicemail for exactly this reason. I have an old-fashioned answering machine at home (well, it's digital so not THAT old-fashioned), with a play button and an erase button. No annoying menus to navigate unless I'm phoning in from elsewhere.
I've never had to use my cellphone's voicemail because, well, it's a cell and I always have it with me.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I want Asynchronous, non-secure communication
Your wife phones you, you are not at your desk. After three rings (or less), it goes "Speak!"
She says "Pick up milk on the way home".
You get back from the can, go to your desk, and press the "Listen" button. You immediately hear your wife's message. No passwords, no pins, no dialing, nuthing.
Next, you press the "respond" button, and you hear "SPEAK!". You say "OK!", and hang up.
You listen to her message at your leisure, and she to yours.
No muss, no fuss.
This would work great for cell phones.
The key is instant access to the message, and "one click respond".
The way it is now is pathetic and frustrating and time wasting and THE BANE OF MY EXISTENCE!!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
favorite boy name
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: So what?
I don't have to reply right away and if their message is buried in a mountain of messages, it's searchable, so I can look them up specifically or for all messages pertaining to the same subject (or at least have a same key word).
Voice mail might be offer a richer message (emotions, more information faster) but the usability of a text-based message is much more appealing in my opinion.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
voicemail
Text-Messaging can be nice amongst the family, friends, relatives but I would not want my boss to sms me.
As for email, I usually use it for either professional purpose or for international correspondance.
[ link to this | view in thread ]