Fighting Spam By... Doing The Same Thing?
from the say-one-thing,-do-another dept
A panel discussion concerning how to stop spam at the Next Generation Networks conference started out by saying that the fight against spam had not been strategic enough. In other words, the responses weren't really targeted at the root of the problem. So, what's the more strategic solution? Actually, the suggestions given in the article sound exactly like what's already being done: filtering, tell people not to respond to spam and laws that punish spammers. How is that any more strategic? That sounds just as tactical.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
Your privacy is extremely important to us. You are receiving this promotional message as a member of Permission! By continuing to receive emails from Permission! you agree to the Permission! Privacy Policy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Doing the same thing... that spammers do
I wrote this about a year ago, thinking that flooding spammers' servers would make them think twice about exposing themselves. At least it's something different.
I let it go because I wasn't sure of the legal implications of promoting DDoS attacks. It's always easier for government to prosecute the good guys, rather than the bad guys. Good guys are so much easier to catch.
[ link to this | view in thread ]