Latest Study Says Downloading Decreases Sales
from the but-is-that-a-bad-thing? dept
Because studies seem to come out every few weeks saying one or the other thing, it's hard to really put too much faith in any of the recent studies that say that file sharing increases or decreases music sales. The latest one says that decreases sales, but admits that people seem to "value" the music they buy more than the music they download. You could quibble with the methodology, which appears to rely on asking people what they would buy, rather than doing any kind of real experiment. So, for example, there's no real way to tell from the study if people used file sharing to discover new music, which they would later buy. Instead, all the study suggests is that people would end up buying music they didn't really like that much if they didn't have file sharing. That doesn't seem like a bad thing. What it suggests, in fact, is that people use file sharing to sample music -- and if it's no good, they won't purchase it. That seems like a good thing. The recording industry should take that and realize that, if they produced more good music, they'd sell more music. Instead, they look at study results like this and think about how they can have their politician friends create more useless and expensive laws saying "file sharing is bad" while suing people for daring to listen to music.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Good for who though ?
Second, and much harder to address, is the idea of producing 'better music'. I'm so much for this but because my tastes are different from the next person's, 'better' is harder to qualify.
And the studies should all pretty much show the same thing over time. Buying music on line should decrease as folks fill out their collections for this media switch (CD to Digital) and sharing will go back up as we start looking for better music.
Hmmmm. Sounds like better music would solve everyone's problems.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Good for who though ?
I disagree... I'd bet that sampling also increases sales in many ways. I can't tell you the number of CDs that I own because I first heard it at a friend's house or in a friend's car... I don't use any file sharing programs, but I'd imagine it functions in a similar way
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Good for who though ?
[ link to this | view in thread ]