Spyware vs. Spyware

from the just-what-everyone-needs dept

What would you expect from sneaky companies that feel the need to put nasty applications on your computer without first making it clear to you what they really do, and then making themselves nearly impossible to uninstall? Since there are so many of these spyware/adware/malware offerings out there, sooner or later they were going to have to clash. The latest is that one such firm, Avenue Media, is freaking out that another firm is removing their software. That's right, while it's nearly impossible for you to remove some of the adware crap you get stuck with -- other adware providers are figuring out ways to disable the competition. It's tough to feel sorry for either party. Avenue Media claims that DirectRevenue has disabled 1 million customers -- representing half of its installed base. All this says to me is that people who tend to get one piece of crap adware seem to end up with multiple pieces of adware. As for DirectRevenue, the company that actually raised a bunch of VC money, recently claimed they were shedding the spyware label by focusing on "transparency, transparency, transparency," with their users. Apparently, that transparency doesn't apply to competitors. The one good thing that may come of this, is that the lawsuit may bring about a more detailed understanding concerning what's legal for software applications to do in changing your computer without first making it clear what they're doing.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Beck, 8 Dec 2004 @ 9:37am

    Detection Avoidance

    If one piece of spyware is running on a computer, the owner doesn't notice. But when several get on their and they really start to bog things down, and compete with each other for resources, and start locking up Internet Explorer, then the owner realizes that something is wrong and calls his brother-in-law to fix his computer. The brother-in-law comes over, discovers all of the spyware, and removes it.



    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Beck, 8 Dec 2004 @ 9:41am

    Error

    "There", not "their"

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Dec 2004 @ 11:25am

    No Subject Given

    "making themselves nearly impossible to install"

    I think you mean "making themselves nearly impossible to uninstall".

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    Mike (profile), 8 Dec 2004 @ 10:48pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    I think you mean "making themselves nearly impossible to uninstall".

    Absolutely right. Fixed. Thanks for pointing it out.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    hanzie, 9 Dec 2004 @ 8:25am

    Funny debate coming up in court

    I can see how this lawsuit could turn out to be fun. You see, DirectRevenue actually specifies in their EULA that, by accepting the EULA, the user grants them the right to uninstall any software they like. So technically, users have granted their permission for Avenue's spyware to be removed by DirectRevenue (that is, if they can be said to have accepted the EULA).
    So what argument is Avenue Media going to use? "No, they can't do that. The only one who can determine what software stays or goes on this user's PC is us!!" Yeah, that's gonna stick! :-)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Dennis Tedder, 13 Mar 2007 @ 12:52pm

    Threatening

    If I can find out which company owns CiD popup and installed it on my drive, I would like to pay them a personal face-to-face visit.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Dennis Tedder, 9 Apr 2007 @ 12:15pm

    You think this is threatening?

    You have not read the elements of offence with respect to "threatening" as it were. A quote from a movie goes, "you haven't seen me in a threaten yet."

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Marcy Ambrose, 17 Jul 2007 @ 8:37am

    Re: Threatening

    This guy is not one whom you should threaten.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.