AOL Falls In Love With The Wrong Spam Stats -- Says Spam Decreased
from the no,-just-the-complaints... dept
AOL is claiming that their new spam filter has greatly reduced spam, creating nice looking headlines about less spam. Of course, you could question their findings. The details show that what was reduced was spam complaints. This might be a proxy for the amount of spam that got through to inboxes, or it might just show that AOL subscribers have wised up and realized that reporting spam to AOL doesn't seem to do a bit of good -- and they've just given up on it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
AOL Spam Filters
- Spammers are realizing that AOL spam filters are good and have stopped spamming AOL addresses as much or they're afraid of CAN-SPAM.
- Spammers have gotten better at evading AOL's filters, so not as much gets blocked, invalidating the first statistic. If AOL's filters aren't blocking spam that they should, or AOL havs a list of spammers that's out of date (perhsaps missing bots), that could also invalidate the second statistic.
- Spammers have moved more to SPIM (Spam Instant Messages). Using IMs instead of E-mail is more in-your-face and I don't know if AOL filters SPIM yet (although users can turn on IM filtering).
So, while I won't discard the statistics, I do agree they seem to need more supporting information.Having some inkling of spammers, that doesn't seem very likely.
However, if that were the case, I'd think complaints would have stayed the same or gone up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Forgot One
[ link to this | view in thread ]