BSA Wants To Make The DMCA Worse
from the some-good,-some-bad dept
While the BSA has mostly sat back and let the RIAA and MPAA take the brunt of the bad publicity for suing customers, you can be pretty sure that they're also freaking out over file sharing and avoiding any and all evidence about how it could help their member companies. Just as the RIAA lost yet another case saying they have to actually file lawsuits before sending subpoenas to ISPs for user info, the BSA is asking Congress to modify the DMCA to force ISPs to cooperate and give up user info without a lawsuit being filed. This is very problematic for plenty of reasons -- not the least of which is that it would turn ISPs into an enforcement arm that will be forced to monitor how people use their network. ISPs just provide the service. If companies have a problem with what an individual is doing, they should file a lawsuit and then request the info from the ISP. Without a lawsuit, it's all just a fishing expedition. At the same time, however, the BSA is at least interested in exploring some amount of patent reform -- including plans to make it easier to challenge granted patents. That might be a slight improvement -- but it could also lead to many frivolous challenges. It seems a much more reasonable idea is to open up the patent process so that people have an easy process to make prior art claims before a patent is granted.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Enforcement Arm
There may be more to the BSA's request than that, but this article didn't discuss it and I'm not about to register to read the source (or install BugMeNot to skip registration).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Software / Technology patents
When the patent system was put in place, 7 years was probably a reasonable amount of time to give someone "exclusive rights" to their invention or idea. Thinking back in the 1800s, it might have taken 7 years to get any kind of return on the investment made to a product. When talking software, or technology...most technology that is patented (especially software technologies) become obsolete years before the patent even expires.
If they shortened the term to say.. a year... that would give a small upstart (or *gasp* a large corporation) enough time to recover costs for the R&D that went into the invention, but wouldn't completely screw the competition from being able to .... compete.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A Year?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]