GPS Snooping Opens Pandora's Box
from the private/public-divide dept
A US District Court in New York has ruled that police don't need a warrant to attach a GPS device to a suspect's car. The reasoning is pretty straightforward. The car, traveling on public roads, could easily be viewed by someone else on those roads -- and thus, there's no expectation of privacy. All the device is doing is helping to automate what a human would have to do before. However, this does seem to raise a fair number of questions, and some are concerned that the Supreme Court will eventually side with police on this issue. While the News.com article here does get into a few of the issues, there are two others that I thought were interesting. If it's legal for police to put a GPS device on your vehicle without you knowing it, what about another person? Assuming you could drive somewhere and follow someone, then would it be illegal for you to just put a GPS system on someone else's car? That seems to follow the logic of the ruling. I would guess this is taken care of by "stalking" laws, and anyone who would put a GPS system on someone's car would likely get accused of that. The second issue, however, is that many newer cars have GPS systems in them. Almost all new mobile phones have GPS systems in them. So, couldn't the police take this one step further, and simply request access to the GPS systems you already have on you? If they don't need a court order to do so, then they could easily just monitor where you are at all times, without any real oversight. Considering that the mobile phone's GPS will follow you off public roads and onto private property, how can the police guarantee that they won't keep tabs on you at those points, as well?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Finders Keepers?
Obviously they didn't want it since they left it behind. I should then be able to take the GPS device that they didn't want and do whatever I want with it.
Wouldn't it be fun to attach this GPS device to some passing animal/car/bus/plane/boat and laugh at the police trying to figure out how I managed to drive my car down into the sewer? :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Slippery slope.. Slippery slope
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
GPS and Radar Detection Equipment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Police and GPS tracking
Cellular phones with GPS usually have a security option that will disallow any in-network queries of their current position. When 911 queries my phone, it prompts me if I want to send the data to them (Motorola i730). I had to enable this option. By default, it was simply denied.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]