SightSound Patents Return; Napster Gets Sued

from the oh,-those-guys... dept

You may remember SightSound as the company that sued CDNow years ago for violating their patent on "electronic sales and distribution of digital audio or video signals." You might wonder how that could possibly be patentable, but you'd have to ask the USPTO to find out the answer. Bertelsmann, the eventual owners of CDNow, tried to have the patent thrown out, but eventually settled the case. However, that means SightSound still has those patents, and they're trying to use them... to get money out of companies. The latest is the "new" Napster, who apparently talked to SightSound about licensing the patents, but eventually decided it didn't make any sense. That, of course, means that SightSound needs to break out the lawyers and file a patent infringement lawsuit. Again, if anyone could explain how something as obvious as "electronic sales and distribution of digital audio or video signals," could be patentable, I'm all ears.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Shaun Shelton, 7 Feb 2005 @ 5:34pm

    Here are some ears...

    Electronic downloading might seem like an 'obvious' thing, and not worthy of a patent, but you are saying that in 2005. These patents were secured long before the Internet, in 1987. If you actually read the patents, you will begin to understand that the process was devised, and clearly articulated for mass distribution regardless the 'source'. It was devised for telecommunications download through multiple sources which now encompasses the Internet. Read the Markman Report on the www.sightsound.com website. Perhaps you'll be a little more informed.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.