French Court Misunderstands Purpose Of Trademarks; Says No To Google
from the not-a-good-sign... dept
While an American judge figured out that the purpose of trademarks is to avoid confusing users, and not to give full control over a trademark to a company, it appears that a French court hasn't quite figured that out. So, in what appears to be the opposite of the US decision saying Google could sell ads based on searches on Geico's trademarked keywords, a French court is telling Google they cannot trigger an ad if someone searches on a trademarked phrase. This is, first, a misunderstanding of the intentions of trademark law, but it's also bad news for Google -- who has already said they plan to appeal. So, is it illegal in France to put two competing brands on the same shelf next each other, such that if someone goes looking for one product, they might see the other?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
trademark law
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Store Shelves
Also, I'm getting kind of tired of that store shelf analogy. Can you show me one instance where a store sells placement next to a competing product? I know that stores sell end caps, but that's position in the store, not next to a competing product. Stores also may sell space based on shelf height (eye-level shelves are preferable), but I don't know if they actually sell that position or just put the products they want to sell there.
Competing products are more likely placed next to each other in stores to keep related product categories together. How confusing would it be for a customer to ask "Where's the beer?" and have a store employee say "Miller is on Aisle 1, Bud on Aisle 2, Heineken on Aisle 16 and the rest on Aisle 5."
If you can't cite one case of competitive position on store shelves being sold, would you please find another analogy? If you can cite one, I'll have learned something new.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Store Shelves
Seems like a pretty definite analogy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trademarks & Advertising
On the other hand, if a competitor has to buy ads which use a competitor's trademark (or even non-trademarked product names), I think that's kind of lame. If they can't build their own buzz, just buying somebody's trademark to flog a product makes me think less of that product.
It may not be illegal, but it gives me a bad impression.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]