Spam Far From Canned
from the oh-well dept
The NY Times is adding to the pile of articles taking a look at the CAN SPAM law one year later and noticing that things haven't gotten much better. It includes all the usual quotes from all the usual suspects, passing the blame off on others. I still have problems with the law -- mainly with the fact that there was no metrics included to see if it was working and no backup plan put in place, which would have made a lot of sense. However, the argument that this has legalized spam no longer seems to be an issue. Recent studies show that compliance with CAN SPAM is nearly non-existent -- meaning that spammers simply don't care. Even if the law gives them an easy way to make their spam "legal," they're still ignoring that option, so the problem hasn't been nearly as big as many (including myself) expected. However, this may come down to the issue of enforcement, which has been the constant refrain from those who put the law in place originally.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
