Can Anyone Sue Any Online Publisher For Libel In The UK?
from the fun-with-jurisdiction dept
Back in 2002 we noted that there was going to be tremendous trouble brewing eventually concerning online jurisdictional questions. The case in question was where someone in Australia wanted to sue an American publisher (Dow Jones) for a story published in the US for a US audience on a New Jersey server. However, the Australian Supreme Court felt that, since the article was online and viewable in Australia, Australian libel laws applied. As you might imagine, this raises a ton of questions, and more or less sets things up so that the most oppressive set of laws in the world automatically applies to anything on the internet. This has resulted in situations like Yahoo's guilt in French "war crimes" cases. The latest lawsuit in this arena suggests just how odd things might get. It involves Dow Jones (again) and uses the Australian case as a citation. In this case, a Saudi Arabian businessman sued the Wall Street Journal over an article published in the US -- but he sued them in London. Why London? Despite the fact that neither he nor the WSJ are in London, the UK has much stricter libel laws. On the good news side of things, the case was thrown out, but for reasons that aren't very helpful in figuring out how to solve this jurisdictional issue. In this case, the court decided that "not enough" people in the UK had seen the article in question. In fact, only five people had viewed the article from the UK, and apparently three of them were associated with the Saudi businessman in question. So, the problem is that this doesn't set a very good precedent. It sets a "just how many people actually viewed this article in this locations" precedent, which is only likely to make the situation worse.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
