Popular Cryptographic Hash Function Possibly Broken
from the uh-oh dept
Last summer, there were rumors swirling that some researchers had figured out how to break SHA-1, a widely-used cryptographic hash function. While it wasn't quite what was advertised, it was clear that some researchers were getting closer, and now Bruce Schneier is reporting that SHA-1 has been broken. If true, then it could require quite a bit of effort to change old systems that rely on it, and could present quite a bit of pain for certain companies.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Chinese cryptographers
Previously only the expected collision issue in SHA-0 was confirmed (along with MD4, MD5, and the original RIPEMD), this new paper appears to actually demonstrate fatal flaws in SHA-1.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Chinese cryptographers
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Chinese cryptographers
But let's be clear: both have utility even in their flawed form. MD5 is computationally quick but not tremendously precise; SHA-1 is more precise, but more computationally taxing.
Both are used heavily by backup software makers: see backuppc.sourceforge.net for interesting discussion of the use of MD5 (and work-arounds for its limitations).
[ link to this | view in thread ]