Does Phishing Need A Separate Law?

from the it'll-get-good-publicity... dept

While Congress has mostly been focused on anti-spyware legislation lately, it appears that some want to create an anti-phishing law as well. Of course, phishing is already very much illegal, but why should that stop a politician's chance to get some press coverage? The claim here is that phishing is only illegal after someone is defrauded -- and this law will make the actions required to phish (the fake website and fake email) illegal as well.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    BtG, 3 Mar 2005 @ 11:30am

    No Subject Given

    and how, exactly, is this law going to affect those organized crime syndicates in eastern europe to stop their phishing attempts? I must have missed that part.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    knight37, 3 Mar 2005 @ 1:55pm

    More Useless Laws, Just What We Needed

    Making a fake site already IS illegal. 99% of these fake sites use the logos and other corporate images of the sites they're trying to pretend to be, so that's a copyright infringement right there. In fact, thanks to the DMCA, all the financial institution or wherever that is being infringed has to do is send cease and desist letter to the ISP of the offending site. THAT IS, of course, if the site is hosted in the United States, and also assuming that the ISP isn't part of the criminal organization. I mean, you don't tell a mobster "stop doing crime" and they just go "okay, sorry about that." But the DMCA doesn't apply to foreign web-sites, which most of the phishing sites are. But FRAUD is already illegal too, it doesn't matter whether or not they actually got someone's money from it yet or not.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.