FCC Takes Some Action On Mobile Fee Creep

from the lay-it-out-clearly dept

It appears that regular customers aren't the only ones fed up with the bizarre, confusing and (often) misleading fees that show up on mobile phone bills. The FCC has decided that mobile phone operators need to follow "truth-in-billing" rules that regular telcos are already supposed to follow. Apparently, this means that operators aren't supposed to break out all the various fees they tack on at the end -- but include those in the base price, so subscribers can do a fair comparison on what they're getting. Of course, even though the article claims that telcos already are covered by this law, they're some of the worst offenders at adding various official looking "fees." Of course, the real problem isn't the operators breaking out the fees -- it's that there's no way to find out what these fees are until after you've signed up -- and they're often subject to change on a monthly basis. The problem is that companies advertise a base rate, but hide the fact that they're tacking on all this extra stuff. It's like a pizza place offering to sell you a pizza for $5, but then tacking on the extra crust, cheese, sauce, toppings, heating and transport fees when it's time to pay. What should really happen is that the companies shouldn't be allowed to advertise base rates if those rates are impossible to actually get. They should be required to advertise what people will actually pay, including all taxes and fees. As long as they do that, breaking out and explaining how they come up with the fees is perfectly reasonable.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 10 Mar 2005 @ 2:50pm

    "real cost"

    The problem is that carriers buy add space that covers whole markets, or even the whole nation. Why should they have to figure in _every_ state, federal, and local tax?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    slim999, 11 Mar 2005 @ 6:12am

    No Subject Given

    You can also help the cause, if this irritates YOU as much as it did me when I got my first bill from Verizon.
    I signed up for a $39.99 monthly plan, and the first and all subsequent bills have never been lower than $44.00.
    So, I filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission. I certainly don't expect them to actually, you know, enforce the law ... but if they get enough complaints, then Congressmen will take notice.
    Their online complaint form is here:
    https://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    eponymous geek, 11 Mar 2005 @ 7:27am

    Subject Given

    one more time, a $30 plan with $15 of recurring monthly fees is a $45 plan. it needs to be advertised as $45 not $30!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Eric, 13 Mar 2005 @ 12:14am

    Local taxes...

    Well, I don't entirely blame the wireless companies. Silly made-up charges like "regulatory recovery fees" definitely should be included in the advertised price. However, the taxes are a nightmare to calculate. When local taxes vary by ZIP code, there's no way the carrier can properly advertise the actual price of the service. Local, state, and federal goverments share in the blame for this "unfair billing".

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.