Attempt To Save Electric Cars Ends In Arrest

from the so-much-for-that-plan dept

A few years ago, when GM decided that it wanted to delete all evidence that they ever built an electric car, a lot of people protested. GM never sold the EV1, but only leased it. When those leases ran out, and GM didn't want the car to exist any more, rather than let existing owners buy the vehicles, GM announced that it wanted to destroy them all. While some EV1 owners have apparently tried to just keep the cars, others have been rounded up, and were supposed to be sent off to be destroyed. This seems like the type of cause some Hollywood actress would pick up on, and indeed, a Baywatch actress helped get some publicity for the cause by getting arrested while trying to stop the EV1s from being sent out for destruction. This is the first time, however, I've seen GM try to come up with an actual reason for destroying the EV1s. They claim there aren't enough parts around to support the cars, meaning they may become unsafe and lead to lawsuits. It's an interesting spin, but wouldn't that also mean they should be taking plenty of other old cars off the road as well?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Oliver Wendell Jones, 15 Mar 2005 @ 12:27pm

    Shh....

    It's an interesting spin, but wouldn't that also mean they should be taking plenty of other old cars off the road as well?

    Shh... don't give them any ideas!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    seth, 15 Mar 2005 @ 1:18pm

    From what I've heard....

    If a company sells a car, they are required (by the government) to make parts for it for 10 years. Since not many of these cars would have been sold, it probably wouldn't have been profitable to produce replacement parts.
    I'm not sure how valid this is but it makes sense to me.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    chris, 15 Mar 2005 @ 1:23pm

    No Subject Given

    If GM let the customers keep them, they (GM) would be legally bound to continue to offer servicing and repairs. Offering those services to the scattered few cars left is economically unfeasable.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.