Publishers Face No-Win Situation In University Spat

from the take-a-chill-pill dept

Ever since the Napster brouhaha of yore, and perhaps before that, a consistent theme has cropped up in cases where content publishers take aim at those who distribute said content without paying for it: although their claims often have merit, their litigious actions potentially harm their cause more than help it. This could happen to the Association of American Publishers, which is making bellicose moves against University of California schools making reserve course material available online. The publishers say this violates fair use because -- even though college libraries have long copied and distributed such materials -- electronic downloads make wide distribution too easy. The publishers could be right, and not enough case law exists to interpret the fuzziness that typically surrounds fair use. However, a lawsuit could result in a Pyrrhic victory, as the case would no doubt bring publishers much negative PR. Moreover, what's to stop academics from choosing different content? Talk about limited distribution.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    dorpus, 7 Apr 2005 @ 11:39pm

    IRB

    It will be interesting to see the collision between the pressure to disseminate information freely, vs. the pressure to protect research data from medical experiments. There are many shades of grey in that area.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      dorpus, 7 Apr 2005 @ 11:54pm

      Re: IRB

      For example, even in anonymous form, we would not want the whole university to know about rates of bladder infections among female undergraduates at the women's clinic. There are scientific journals that talk about stuff like this, but enjoys security-by-obscurity for now.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        NullMan, 9 Apr 2005 @ 2:09am

        Re: IRB

        I do not understand why anyone would have a problem with others knowing about the rates of infection in a population. It might even do some good by letting people know what they need to watch out for, how well a particular health care system is helping its patients, etc.

        link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.