Microsoft, AOL Discover That The Internet Isn't TV
from the well,-look-at-that dept
While some in the media and tech worlds are trying to turn the internet into television so they'd have more control, it appears that Microsoft and AOL are finally realizing that the two act quite differently. While both companies should have realized this years ago, it only cost them a few million dollars each to realize that there's absolutely no benefit to signing deals with Major League Baseball to allow MLB content to be streamed on their sites. Apparently both have cut short multi-million deals with MLB Online after realizing that most people simply went straight to the mlb.com site anyway, and there was almost no benefit at all to paying millions of dollars to have the identical content hosted within their own gardens since surfers don't distinguish. They know they can go wherever they want online, so why would they look for MLB content on AOL or MSN rather than just going straight to MLB? Apparently ESPN (owned by Disney) hasn't realized this, because they're about to make the same mistake and shell out millions to MLB for the privilege of mirroring the same content. Meanwhile, AOL is recognizing that their money and effort is better spent building up baseball fantasy league offerings where users actually participate, communicate and interact with each other (what the internet is good for!). Of course, what's unclear is whether or not the folks at MLB.com (the same people who said they owned all data and facts associated with MLB games) realize this, because if this sort of cash is part of their expected revenues going forward, someone may want to inform their potential investors of trouble ahead.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
How long will major league sports last?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ESPN and MLB
Actually it should work differently for ESPN. Most sports fans start at ESPN and then go elsewhere for more specific data. Housing MLB data on ESPN just keeps surfers from leaving ESPN for MLB.com.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How long will major league sports last?
I'm glad to see that lower class citizens can afford to go to baseball games. For a while there, I thought that ticket prices had gone up so much that only affluent people could attend games. Glad you cleared that up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Microsoft...
but in your headline: Micorosft
don't you mean Microsoft?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Microsoft...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
exclusive, not mirror
Obviously, this kind of deal, as it is with all forms of media, only makes sense if the providers in question get exclusive content, rather than simply mirroring existing content.
And from reading the article, that seems to be the case, since the deals reported on involve "exclusive sports programming rights," "exclusive distribution rights," and "exclusive content arrangements."
This would suggest (if not confirm) that the content to which MS and AOL were licensed would exclusively be broadcast on their respective sites, and not also on the MLB site. The only mirrors they had to worry about were the broadcasts over radio and TV.
From what the article says, it seems more as if video/audio content just wasn't appetizing to MS and AOL anymore - not that they were losing viewers to mirrors of their exclusive content.
[ link to this | view in thread ]