TigerDirect Claims Apple Has Its Trademark By The Tail

from the not-the-PR-we-wanted dept

While Apple ratchets up the hype on tonight's release of the new Mac OS X, aka Tiger, it looks like Steve Jobs and friends are getting a bit of unintended publicity in the form of a trademark infringement lawsuit filed yesterday by TigerDirect. The online computer retailer, which owns a trademark on "Tiger," says that Apple is creating "confusion, mistake and deception among the general purchasing public" by using and widely promoting the name. Of course, the strategy to prove that claim -- saying its search rankings have tumbled because of Apple's marketing efforts -- is a bit weak. First of all, TigerDirect still comes up second in Google results for the term "tiger," while Apple is fourth. Also, it won't be easy to demonstrate that Apple is actually pulling away customers and -- this is the critical part -- deceiving them into thinking the Mac product/site has something to do with TigerDirect. Unless they trot out numbers showing a massive decline in site traffic coinciding with Apple's PR blitz, the claim seems sketchy. If anything, it seems likely that the number of people searching on "tiger" for computer products has gone way up since (and because of) the Mac OS campaign and, if anything, is driving more people to TigerDirect. A preliminary injunction hearing next week will undoubtedly reveal more. Still, considering Apple's extensive experience with naming hassles, you'd think someone there would have foreseen the litigation potential a long time ago and avoided this mess in the first place. Maybe Apple was too busy with its own Tiger lawsuit to notice.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Permanent4, 29 Apr 2005 @ 1:53pm

    Any pub is good pub

    Sounds like TigerDirect is taking a page from the Michael Robertson school of advertising and promotion...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Apr 2005 @ 3:12pm

    Re: Any pub is good pub

    TigerDirect, I haven't heard that name in at least 8 to 10 years! I wonder if they still send out catalogs like AOL sends out CDROMS...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    TJ, 29 Apr 2005 @ 6:53pm

    A little due diligence

    Apple is not a tiny company. Checking for pre-existing trademarks is not difficult. Apple deserves what they get. They made this kind of mistake with an earlier upgrade's name, but biggest of all they made this mistake with the company name Apple, and had to settle with the Beatles-related record company over a similar situation.

    Apple: a mostly smart company that repeatedly makes the same stupid mistake.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Rajesh, 1 May 2005 @ 4:07pm

    Re: A little due diligence

    Not a patent lawyer so I have no idea what this means, but Apple registered "Tiger" as a trademark: http://assignments.uspto.gov/assignments/q?db=tm&sno=78269988. So whats Tigerdirect's beef? That Apple has better marketing?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 May 2005 @ 5:10pm

    Re: A little due diligence

    Have they actually settled with Apple Music? I thought the original settlement was that they wouldn't sell music, and now with iTunes they are in direct violation and are being sued again.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    shock edbe trayed, 2 May 2005 @ 6:41pm

    from the department of DUH

    unless my brain is fried from viewing my empty blog screen for too long, but I am pretty sure that the two things are not competitor products.
    I'll bet that TigerDirect could sell the Tiger version of Apple's OS if it tried hard enough, so like so many other phallacies, this too shall pass.
    Apple knows what they are doing, just as the Sunbeam car owner's club knows that suing Apple over using the Tiger name would be ludacris.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.