Billboard Reporter Suggests The Creative Commons Can Kill?
from the seems-a-bit-extreme dept
We missed this one earlier in the week, so thanks to Copyfight for bringing back some attention to a bizarre and misleading story from Billboard magazine discussing Creative Commons. As Larry Lessig points out, most of the article seems to weave back and forth between supporters of Creative Commons and detractors. While a few of the arguments made are a little odd or misleading, it's not that bad of an article. However, at the end, it concludes with a ridiculous anecdote that has angered some. The article talks about one musician who wrote a hit song in 1970. Apparently, he's still living off of royalties from that one song -- and it helped him to pay for medical treatments that he needed more recently. The implication is clear: if he'd used a Creative Commons license then, he'd be broke and dead. Of course, this is ridiculous for a variety of reasons. First off, as is pointed out in one of the responses, if he'd used a "non-commercial" license, he'd still be receiving the same royalties. Second, there's no telling what else might have happened if he had used a CC license. Perhaps others would have taken the song and remixed it, giving his career a second life -- so that he wasn't just living off the success of one song written 35 years ago. Perhaps he would have gone on to do something else, or been inspired to write more hit songs rather than just living off his one big hit. This brings up a final point: why do people assume that if you write one good song you should be able to live off of it for the rest of your life? If I had a particularly good work day five years ago, it's not going to matter today at work. It might help my reputation, and open up new opportunities, but I still need to work today.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
