Surgery Test Questions Sold On eBay Infringe Copyrights?
from the welcome-to-the-new-world dept
Students stealing test questions and then giving them away or selling them is hardly anything new. However, can such students be accused of copyright infringement? A surgeon who failed his 2002 American Board of Surgery written exam apparently paid his $100 "sitting fee" to later have a chance to look over what he got wrong. Apparently deciding that the $100 was a "good investment" he copied down a bunch of the questions and answers, and later sold them on eBay for a small profit. He also passed the 2003 exam, noting that many of the questions were the same. The Board was not thrilled, eventually stripping him of his certification after having someone pose a potential buyer of the questions. However, they also sued him for copyright infringement and civil theft. The (no longer) surgeon admitted to the copyright infringement and agreed to pay the board $36,000 to hire surgeons to come up with new questions. However, this does raise a variety of questions. While the article focuses on how he got the questions by paying the sitting fee and studying his exam alone (a practice the Board is no longer allowing), is that different than if the surgeon-to-be had just memorized some of the questions while taking the exam? A quick search on Amazon turns up quite a few books with "sample" questions for this exam. It's likely these sample questions were somehow based on real questions. Do they infringe on the copyrights as well? Also, how come no one is asking why the test uses the same questions every year, despite the fact that they were letting surgeons who failed review their failed exams? Finally, with so many other factors contributing to whether or not someone becomes a surgeon (medical school, training, an oral exam and a recommendation from a mentor) is it really such a big deal that a few of the questions got out there?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
health insurance...
I wonder if he cheated on any questions that he may need the knowledge for during your Dad's open heart surgery?
At least this one got caught and has his creds taken.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Time to de-grade and get rid of tests as evaluatio
Alfie Kohn's website has wonderfully thought out arguments against grading and testing, both of which lead to cheating, and have other terrible effects on education.
Here are a few of the good articles:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Copyright
I find it a little amusing that someone came to the defense of the MD and said he's a great young doctor. Well, if he were that great, he shouldn't have failed the exam.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Copyrights
If that was the case, then ABS would have a strong case against the individual. Additionally, the U.S. Copyright Office does provide a measure of protection for tests, or answer materials for tests.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Copyright
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Copyright
[ link to this | view in thread ]