Scripps Looking For A Bargain At Shopzilla

from the shopping-for-shopping-engines dept

Looks like this summer's hot item might be comparison shopping sites -- not even a week after eBay's Scripps acquisition of Shopping.com, Scripps announces their intention to acquire Shopzilla (formerly known as BizRate) for $525 million in cash. The synergies between Shopzilla and Scripps seem obvious at first glance: Scripps' many sites benefit by having a commerce play, and Scripps' content help differentiate Shopzilla in the commodotized comparison shopping market. However, the statement from the Scripps' CEO that "In many ways, like our other media businesses, Shopzilla is a content company" seems misguided. If Scripps treats Shopzilla like a traditional content company, they overlook the actual strengths of the Shopzilla service. Shopzilla is much more a shopping tool & service, with its strength in the long-tail of merchants, products, and user opinions that it offers. To simply treat Shopzilla as another brand within a content portfolio could limit its potential. Then again, if Scripps takes a lesson from BizRate and applies its model and technology to content aggregation (as outlined by two Scripps executives last month), perhaps there's a viable strategy in the works. Who got the best bargain: Excite's Jango in 1997 for $35M, Amazon's Junglee in 1998 for $186M, CNET's mySimon in 2000 for $700M, Yahoo's Kelkoo in 2004 for $579M, eBay's Shopping.com buy for $620M last week, or today's Scripps-Shopzilla deal? What's next? PriceGrabber-IAC? NexTag-MSN?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 6 Jun 2005 @ 4:56pm

    Overpriced

    Wow, they could have made the same software for that for 99.9% less.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Dr. Apathy, 7 Jun 2005 @ 3:15pm

      Re: Overpriced

      Yes, but they couldn't have gotten the brand, and they still would have had to deal with a competitor they no longer have to deal with. Any monkey can make software cheaply. But good business has little to do with it.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.