The Continuing Question Of Corrections And Changes To Newspaper Online Archives

from the this-again? dept

It must be summer time... It seems that every summer, the Online Journalism Review runs a piece exploring the question of how newspapers handle the issue of corrections and changes with articles that appear in online archives. Two years ago, they explored whether or not newspapers should ever correct stories after they're written -- challenging the belief that what was written down on paper was untouchable, and all corrections should be in a separate corrections section that no one would ever read. Last year they explored the idea in more detail, with a number of newspapers worried that changes would be seen as "fiddling with the truth." The latest version takes a slightly different look at the issue, looking at how newspapers deal with slightly more complex issues, such as articles that are controversial or that raise serious complaints. The article notes a few different anecdotes, related to very different situations. In one case, the newspaper was afraid that the article would create more problems in certain communities, but eventually decided to publish the story late. In another, it's unclear exactly what happened, but the story was about an upstart competitor to the newspaper, and most people believe the publisher pulled the story, because he didn't want the competitor to have publicity (a very weak reason, if true). The last one was a case where the story had serious problems and received a ton of complaints. The paper removed it, and pointed to a different piece that was apparently much better. However, in all three cases, one thing becomes clear pretty quickly: the whole concept of trying to "hide" stuff from an online community doesn't work. Once it's online, it's there -- and trying to hide it tends to only get more attention. It seems that the straightforward note or explanation at the top for any changes and issues would make the most sense, rather than trying (and failing) to erase what was written.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    hnovus, 8 Jun 2005 @ 9:30am

    stop the insanity

    if changes are allowed, then history changes with each revision; but no hard copy is left.

    Is that what those in control want to happen? Of course, then their foibles can be wiped away after the majority of the populace has forgotten.

    But, hey; that's my POV.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Mike (profile), 8 Jun 2005 @ 9:36am

    Re: stop the insanity

    Well, that's why it makes sense to *note* what the changes are, so people can see.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Jun 2005 @ 10:48am

    Re: stop the insanity

    That's what makes wikis so powerful, as one can trace the changes to the entry over time.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Smack, 8 Jun 2005 @ 11:41am

    Orwellian

    "He who controls the past, controls the present"

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Nillewro, 8 Jun 2005 @ 6:27pm

    Re: Orwellian

    "He who controls the present, controls the past"

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.