Financial Times Caught Helping Link Spammers With Hidden Links
from the sneaky,-sneaky,-sneaky... dept
In the past few months, there have been a number of stories where otherwise reputable sites (usually managed by a small group of people) were caught selling space on their site to various search engine spammers. From WordPress to Syndic8 to the Stanford Daily student newspaper -- all have been caught doing somewhat sneaky things after being paid by advertisers who only want links from those pages to boost their rank in various search engines. In all of these cases, after some light was shown on what was happening, (and often after Google punished the sites by removing them from their index), the sites all agreed to stop the slimy advertising practice. However, what happens when a much bigger, more well known website sinks to the same levels? Perhaps we're about to find out. Adrants points out that The Financial Times' website is using hidden links pointing to some random website. The hidden link they're using is fairly simple -- they just made the text color the same as the background color. Either way, though, it's a sneaky trick clearly designed only to boost the link recipient's search engine ranking through underhanded methods. It's both odd and surprising that the Financial Times would stoop so low -- though, as one of the comments notes, perhaps this is just a rogue FT webmaster trying to help a friend or earn some extra cash. Either way, the question remains: will Google punish the Financial Times by removing it from their index the same way they punished WordPress and Syndic8?Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team