Beastie Boys Don't Have To Fight For Their Right To Sample
from the free-can-be-good dept
The practice of sampling has been the source of contention in the music industry for some time. On the one side there are those who want to be adequately compensated for their work and want to enforce the most strict copyright standards on it. On the other side are those who advocate making it easier to borrow and build on the works of others and relaxing copyright restrictions. Now the courts have had their final say on where one line should be drawn: the Supreme Court declined to hear the case of jazz musician James Newton, who had been arguing that the Beastie Boys infringed on his copyright. The rappers had properly licensed his recording, and nobody disputes that, but Newton wanted them also to pay for his "underlying composition." An appeals court dismissed his lawsuit, saying that the six-second sample of Newton's composition was not distinctive enough to be considered his work. Despite gaining the support of several musician groups, Newton and other artists should be somewhat encouraged by this outcome. If this situation serves as any sort of precedent, the rights holder will still get compensated for sampled recordings, while artists will get (at least just a little) more leeway to build on existing works and truly create something interesting. Forcing fellow artists to pay you for the right to use a succession of musical notes that have probably been heard and performed in various forms for centuries, is not the way to encourage musical innovation.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
