Trading The Broadcast Flag For A Change In The DMCA

from the horse-trading dept

Tue, Jun 14th 2005 9:28am — Mike Masnick

After the courts announced that mandating a broadcast flag was outside the scope of the FCC's authority, it didn't take long for the entertainment industry to start pushing for legislation to change that. They also went on their sob story tour, telling the world that there would be no more broadcast content without the broadcast flag, while at the same time admitting that they had no problem inconveniencing all Americans by breaking their existing consumer electronics products. The good news was that (for once!) Congress didn't immediately kowtow to the industry and rush through a straight-from-Hollywood bill to the floor. Instead, they actually pushed back and said they didn't see a reason to push for the broadcast flag. However, now comes the horse trading period. Rep. Rick Boucher, one of the few Congressmen who actually seems to believe in fair use rights has put out a public statement offering a trade of sorts: Congress will approve the broadcast flag, if the MPAA lets Congress defang some of the DMCA, with Boucher's DMCRA bill. The idea is that with fair use protected, the "worst" of the broadcast flag is clipped. Of course, you have to wonder why, exactly, Congress feels the need to get permission from the MPAA to do anything? Aren't they a private organization with a clear position trying to protect their business model? Why should Congress need to trade or get approval from them for anything? Why can't Congress just do what's best for the people (okay, okay, stop laughing...)?

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

2 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Seth Brundle, 14 Jun 2005 @ 11:31am

Whats best for the people
Congress represents all American interests, not just consumerism. Without business their is no consumerism.

It is completely reasonable and logical for congress to negotiate these laws between the industry and consumer interests to find what works best for both and is fair.

Although the MPAA notoriously overstates its case, a world where video and audio are pirated unimpeded will simply result in cheaply produced entertainment products at exhuberant prices.

[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike (profile), 14 Jun 2005 @ 11:44am
  
  Re: Whats best for the people
  Shouldn't Congress support the open market and let it decide what's right? As long as the market is open, the businesses develop on their own. So, why should Congress support specific industries if the market won't support them?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]