The Osborne Effect Is A Myth?
from the clarification-please... dept
Robert Cringely's latest column spends the first half clearing up the myth of the Osborne Effect. Lots of people (including us) were discussing the Osborne Effect, following Steve Jobs' announcement about switching to Intel processors in a year. However, according to Cringely, it wasn't the pre-announcement that killed Osborne. Instead, it was the fact that the cheaper Kaypro system had a much bigger screen than any Osborne machine -- and people valued that bigger screen much more than the various other enhancements found in the Osborne machine. Sounds quite similar to the real reason that VHS beat the betamax. While the common story is that the VHS was an inferior technology that still happened to win out, it was another case where marketers failed to understand what people found really valuable about what they were selling. The VHS could record more. And that feature, like the larger screen on the Kaypro, apparently, was what helped it win the competition.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
History
oldcomputers.net
"sales dropped, from about 10,000 a month for the original model, to essentially zero for the new model. The reason for the drop was that the Osborne Executive was not competitive with the Kaypro"
Cringely
"In 1980, British company Sinclair released their ZX80 computer for $199.95. One year later, they released the new and improved ZX81. Compared to the ZX80, the ZX81 was much cheaper, at only $99.95, the first computer for under $100."
oldcomputers.net
I was running a computer company at this time and:
1) The "Osborne effect" is not something invented with hindsight, but was discussed a lot at the time.
2) Although I saw (and had a brief play with) an Osborne, I never heard of the Keypro until today.
3) A lot of computers were being invented around then (timeline), including from Sinclair, and prices were falling rapidly.
I think Osborne was killed by a marketing mistake (the Osborne effect) and because it let its prices get out-of-line with the market in general. (They are not strictly comparable, but an Osborne cost 20 times as much as a Sinclair in 1882/3). Kaypro was unimportant. Also the Osborne remains the ugliest computer that I have ever seen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oops
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]