Is Stealing A Statue Like Hacking A Server?
from the questions-to-ponder dept
This might not seem like a tech-related story at first, but there's an interesting parallel. An art student in Chile apparently broke into a museum last week and stole a Rodin statue. However, he's been temporarily released after saying he only stole it to test the security at the museum. This sounds mighty familiar to stories of so-called "good samaritan hackers" who break into servers to point out security vulnerabilities. Of course, you could point out that the good samaritan who actually takes something once they've shown the security hole has gone a bit too far. Still, it does raise some issues about the limits of claiming you're a good samaritan. Otherwise, anyone caught performing any crime will simply claim they were pointing out the vulnerabilities involved.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I don't think its the same
A better parallel is if you telephoned a company and tricked their secretary into sending you confidential information. Then, before she had a chance to mail it to you, you called back and told her you were only testing. While I'm sure the company would be mad at your little test, I don't think there would be the same legal repercussions as one would expect if you 'called' and pulled the same trick on one of their machines. Why?
[ link to this | view in thread ]