Is Big Media Failing To Adapt Because Of One-Sided Regulations?
from the declining-fortunes dept
It's been a favorite media pastime to speculate on why the AOL Time Warner merger was a huge bomb. One think-tank thinker, Adam Thierer of the Progress & Freedom Foundation, looks at the flop in a larger context and asks, whatever happened to the "big media monopoly" that everyone was concerned about and, more importantly, where are we heading? Of course, we all know now that the new media revolution passed the conglomerates by (and for the most part still has) -- they've failed to keep up with the "customization, personalization, choice, competition, and, above all, abundance," as Thierer puts it, that shapes the new world. Moreover, he argues that outdated FCC regulations, which apply only to traditional media, are hampering their transition to new media. Conversely, people and companies relying on new media are free from many of the existing restrictions and therefore have an unfair advantage over traditional types. Sounds good in theory, but more than any regulations, old media companies have hurt themselves worse by clinging to existing business models, trying to rig the system to fit those models, and forcing people to consume their products the way they (the companies) want them to be consumed. They could make the transition much easier on themselves -- outdated regulations or not -- by embracing new business models that cede more control to consumers, rather than the other way around.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
You have to be careful with TCS stories like this.
You'll notice that the article also links up an uncritical interview with an FEC commissioner who was busted for spreading anti-campaign-finance-reform FUD. The interviewer just lets this guy say all kinds of nutty (and untrue) stuff about McCain-Feingold, as long as it feeds the libertarian anti-campaign finance angle that TCS pushes.
While we're at it, let's take a look at TCS's leanings: they're against environmental regulation, against smoking bans, against campaign finance reform, and against any kind of FCC restrictions on media mergers. What does that make them? It makes them corporate shills for Big Oil, Big Tobacco, Big Business, and Big Media. These guys are bought and sold.
Again, not everyone who writes for them is a hack and/or corporate shill. But their editors are, and much of there content is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You have to be careful with TCS stories like t
To be honest, we're not too concerned about the reputation of the site on its own, but what's being said in the article we're discussing -- which is exactly what we did in this case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You have to be careful with TCS stories like t
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You have to be careful with TCS stories like t
Just letting "nuts" speak their piece is called free speech. It's something to be promoted. Only listening to those you agree with is an unhealthy, incestuous, form of behavior.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]