SCO Suddenly Thinks Open Source Is Grand...

from the hey,-wait-a-second... dept

It really wasn't that long ago that SCO was saying that any GPL-backed software was illegal under a completely bizarre interpretation of copyright law. Yet, suddenly, with basically nothing left in their sham case against IBM and Linux in general, they're proudly announcing how their latest software includes various open source offerings, including a few with GPL licenses. In explaining this, SCO's tap dancing spokesperson says: "We don't necessarily have issues with open source, we just have an issue with open-source technology that includes intellectual property it shouldn't." That's not what they said in court a few years ago, but considering the source, is it really any surprise they've changed the story?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Jun 2005 @ 4:21am

    That is what they said in court years ago

    Mike,

    The suit is against IBM re-using proprietary code they weren't allowed to re-use. Anyone with 2 brain cells can see the rest is all dumb and/or grandiose posturing by various clueless CEOs -- half the time spurred on by people paid indirectly by Big Blue, for god's sake. It's as plain as the nose on your face.

    I'm disappointed that you can't keep your head about you long enough to resist what a billion vanished dollars are making you think. You're just like the other clueless sycophants.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Mikes Buddy, 24 Jun 2005 @ 5:30am

    Re: That is what they said in court years ago

    Take your attitude elsewhere, Dorkus.

    Mike is awesome.

    I like Mike.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Hero, 24 Jun 2005 @ 9:53am

    Re: That is what they said in court years ago

    I can see how anyone with only 2 brain cells might believe that. Heck, they could probably even get a job as a SCO shill.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    VonSkippy, 24 Jun 2005 @ 11:19am

    No Subject Given

    SCO - who?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Reality, 24 Jun 2005 @ 1:41pm

    Re: That is what they said in court years ago

    Hey Mike!

    Lookee here, you're getting attention from SCO stooges and MicroSoftdicks.

    Regarding the story, I wouldn't trust SCO with wiping my ass properly. They may even be lying about their support for OSS, just to identify new victims for their legal extortion.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.