Does The Public Care About Microprocessor Anti-Trust Trials?

from the who-are-you-trying-to-convince? dept

Years back, Intel did something fairly amazing: it working out a way to brand a boring microprocessor so that many consumers actually cared enough to know if Intel was "inside." Normally, average consumer couldn't care any less about the specific technology included in the computers they buy. The successful marketing campaign is part of why Intel was so successful for many years. It looks like AMD is trying a different spin on the same idea. Following their plans to sue Intel for anti-trust violations, they took their side of the anti-trust story to the public, taking out large ads in a number of newspapers. With the inclusion of Roll Call, it's pretty clear they're hoping to influence law-makers and policy-makers, but some of the other placements suggest that they really are trying to convince consumers of the merits of their case. There's just one problem. Consumers really don't care about anti-trust trials concerning a component on their computer. It was an amazing enough feat to convince them to care about the brand of what was inside in the first place. For AMD to then try to get them to care about whether or not certain practices around those chips violate anti-trust rules, seems like a waste of time. Wouldn't they be better off focusing on convincing customers that AMD's chips are better, and getting end-users to drive demand that way?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Jeff, 29 Jun 2005 @ 10:35am

    They can promote their processors until they're bl

    It won't change the fact that Intel has probably bullied mfr's into using Intel only. Pretty much the same way Microsoft did when PC mfr's wanted to include Netscape back in the 90's.

    AMD's product is clearly better now. How come the major PC makers still use Intel only?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 29 Jun 2005 @ 11:00am

      Re: They can promote their processors until they'r

      What's weird, though, is that AMD doesn't really seem to be saying that Intel is bullying companies, but rather incentivizing them with money. That seems like smart business -- not bullying or anti-trust.

      If AMD can get more end user demand built up -- and clearly, the geekier community is increasingly recognizing how good AMD's chips are -- then computer makers won't be able to avoid offering up AMD.

      Anyway, the point of this article, though, wasn't about the merits of the case, but to wonder why AMD would take the case to the public -- who probably don't care.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Dino Morelli, 29 Jun 2005 @ 12:40pm

    CPU antitrust

    That the public doesn't care is perhaps a sign that something is really wrong here. The same thing happens with Microsoft. It doesn't matter that Windows is a piece of garbage, most people don't care. Microsoft already took over with creepy practices.

    People should care very deeply about anti-competitive practices in hardware. I had, and got rid of, a Toshiba laptop in the past. A so-called "BIOS-less" system, where you could only access BIOS things with Windows. This is just plain bad.

    And let's just not even get started on the Trusted Computing nightmare that looms in our near future.

    Wouldn't they be better off focusing on convincing customers that AMD's chips are better

    mm, how does that work? Like convincing people that OSX or Linux is better? Tell me another good one, like success in the IT field isn't related to the boss ass-kiss factor.

    In any case, I see this as a whistleblower maneuver, A good thing. Now if we could just get AMD to quit the TCPA cartel...

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.