How Dare The BBC Introduce New Listeners To Beethoven
from the how-dare-you-not-charge!!!! dept
Never underestimate the short-sightedness of record execs -- even at classical music labels, who you'd think would be a bit more understanding about these things. Last month the BBC got some attention for releasing, for free, downloads (just for a period of time) of all nine of Beethoven's symphonies. I downloaded them, as did about a million other people apparently. It was a nice gesture, and probably introduced plenty of people to elements of classical music that they had not experienced before. In fact, since they included an introductory explanation before each symphony, even those familiar with the music could learn something as well, adding to their overall appreciation for classical music. All of that, you would think, should be applauded by the industry -- as it should only help to drive more interest in the often ignored area of the music world. Not so. GeekNewsCentral points out that classical record label execs are positively livid about such impudence. Proving just how little he's thought through this issue, the head of one label explains: "There is the obvious issue that it is devaluing the perceived value of music. You are also leading the public to think that it is fine to download and own these files for nothing." That's because it is fine. It's completely legal, and even more important, it's helping to get a lot more people interested in the music which is only likely to increase sales. As for "devaluing the perceived value of music," does he wonder why so many classical music organizations are having so much trouble staying around? It's because there aren't enough people listening to the music -- which often involves expensive tickets to fancy symphony halls. What they need is to devalue the music to make it more accessible.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
> What they need is to devalue the music to make it more accessible.
Please! If I wanted devalued classical music, I'd listen to Classic FM: third-rate performances, fourth-rate presenters, and their idea of celebrating Easter, when anyone else would put on a couple of Passions, is to run up Another Blinkin' Chart(TM).
No thanks; I'm all in favour of exactly the way the BBC have done it, enough said :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's why...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That's why...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
missed it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: missed it
You can buy the .flacs and .wavs, or just download the .oggs and .mp3s.
If you do decide to buy, you chose what to pay, from $8 to $20, IIRC.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]