Does Google News Have A Sense Of Humor?

from the perhaps-not dept

David Goldenberg writes in with a link to an article he wrote for the site Gelf "about how Google News deals with its sources -- in particular, satire publications. I talked with several different editors about their interactions with Google, and found out some interesting things, like how Google News seems to rely heavily on reader input to manage its sources and why satire sources sometimes appear more relevant than straight news." Once again, like so many things Google, the biggest complaint people have is the complete lack of transparency -- which often makes their decisions seem completely arbitrary. From our own, Techdirt, standpoint, it's been interesting. Google News originally told us we weren't acceptable for their site, based on a list of four criteria, not a single one of which was accurate. After we countered each point, they did let us in. However, it seems like they only pick up on one or two posts from Techdirt every few days, rather than all of our posts. That's fine... except that they do seem to include almost every post from another site (not named here) that simply takes our content and posts it as their own. That leads to plenty of people finding our content on that other site, rather than here, since Google News turns up that site much more frequently than ours. I have no problem with the site in question, which does credit us (though, it would be nice if they credited us a bit more clearly), but it seems like Google News should at least include our original content more frequently than a site that simply copies our content. As for the sense of humor thing, perhaps we really do need to start using sarcasm tags, or perhaps just a color coded system to make sure that Google understands which parts are jokey and which are not.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Ivan Sick, 14 Jul 2005 @ 5:06am

    No Subject Given

    Mike, what were the four criteria? (very curious about this)
    I wonder if that other site will pick up this story. Google won't.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    name_withheld, 14 Jul 2005 @ 5:40am

    well...

    I certainly get the feeling that slashdot's parent company wouldn't mind being acquired by google.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Jul 2005 @ 1:54pm

    Re: well...

    s/google/anyone/

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    name_withheld, 14 Jul 2005 @ 6:25pm

    Re: Re: well...

    that was funny

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.