Is It Illegal To Advertise In Illegal Adware?
from the probably-not dept
It's no secret that plenty of well known companies have been advertising with the various adware providers. A few months ago, NY AG Eliot Spitzer suggested that he was going to go after sites that partnered or advertised with adware companies that do surreptitious installs. While that move may have successfully made some advertisers start to reconsider where they advertise, it has some legal experts scratching their heads asking what's actually illegal about advertising in adware -- even if the adware is breaking laws. The advertiser is separate from the liability, unless they are actively involved in whatever illegal activity the adware company is involved in. So, it seems likely that this was really more of a scare tactic to get advertisers to think twice about what they were doing. Of course, that might make good business sense for the advertisers as well. Being associated with some of these companies -- whether they're illegal or not -- may harm the advertisers' reputation anyway.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Sounds like a case for an ASBO
"Anti-social behaviour orders [can be served on people] if they have have behaved "in an anti-social manner that caused or was likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress", and that the order is "necessary to protect persons from further anti-social acts. This has allowed asbos to be used to ban activity that is not in itself criminal, such as begging, prostitution and even playing football or being sarcastic...
Breaching an asbo is a criminal offence, carrying a penalty of up to five years' imprisonment, even when the original offence was not an imprisonable one."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More about ASBOs and spamming
"You may have read the flyposters.
"You may have read the press reports or seen the television news items concerning the recent application by the London Borough of Camden for Anti-Social Behaviour Orders against executives of Sony Music Entertainment (UK) Limited and BMG UK & Ireland Limited in respect of flyposting."
It's debateable which is hated more, spamming or flyposting, so the use of an ASBO to stop companies advertising in spam is not completely far-fetched.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
isn't this this same question as spam
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
You hire me to do a job that is illegal, you are liable at least for complicity, and at worst for conspiracy.
You hire me to do a job not knowing my methods... maybe not... but you don't go to Gator or Spam-R-Us thinking they do legitimate business.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
advertisers are liable..
No, they are not. It is called 'accessory' as in 'accessory to murder, robery.. & spyware.. Different degree, same concept.. If I help you do something which is illegal, I am (partialy) responsible. So are the advertisers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Business as usual?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]