Taking Back The Intellectual Property Propaganda
from the a-demonstration dept
Back in May we had a post about Microsoft's propaganda campaign/contest, called "Thought Thieves," where they wanted kids to make films about how "intellectual property theft" harms society. Of course, in the film, you cannot use any third party intellectual property (which would be nearly impossible) and, amusingly, once you submit it, all of the intellectual property you created becomes the possession of Microsoft. The EFF is now letting us know that this contest has inspired a reverse contest, called Thought Thieve$, which is a contest for people to make a film about corporations appropriating "knowledge, culture, and creativity" from elsewhere. While they say the focus is on "big corporations," it doesn't seem like it should be limited to just big corporations. The idea is amusing, but it's really taking the wrong strategy -- blaming companies for misuse of intellectual property, rather than pointing out the overall flaw in the system. That is, a much better idea would be to produce films that show how the free use of intellectual property has helped create incentives for innovation and allowed for amazing new products, services and artwork by building on the inspiration of others to create something even better. Instead of highlighting the negative, why not show how more open sharing of intellectual property can benefit society and the economy -- rather than toeing the line that it can only hurt the economy?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Improving Techdirt.com
The last half of this article as an example:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Improving Techdirt.com
And, I'm not sure where you believe we've been upset about a "failure to credit Techdirt properly." In fact, we've pointed out that the whole credit issue is largely overblown. Plenty of sites do credit us. Some use stories from us without crediting us. It's not a huge deal. If we see an obvious copying, we might send a friendly note suggesting that clearer credit would be nice, but it really doesn't make much of a difference to us.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Improving Techdirt.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Improving Techdirt.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Improving Techdirt.com
I was merely making a friendly suggestion that was obviously misguided. Glad you read the comments, but I'll be sure to avoid this site in the future, given it's stated and asserted goals.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Improving Techdirt.com
The discussion wasn't about how the site wasn't giving us credit (they actually do give us credit), but how Google's algorithm wasn't working properly and was linking to their copies *instead* of rather than *in addition to* our posts.
but I'll be sure to avoid this site in the future, given it's stated and asserted goals.
Sorry to lose you. I'm confused as to why you're not interested in analysis, but obviously, it's your call.
[ link to this | view in thread ]