FedEx Throws A DMCA Fit Over Creative Use Of Their Boxes

from the lawyers-have-no-sense-of-humor dept

Corporate lawyers really do have no sense of humor, do they? Recently, one of the popular sites that was getting linked and passed around was FedExFurniture.com. It was, like so many "pass around" sites, an amusing website that you looked at, laughed at, and moved on. A software engineer trying to save some money ended up building a bunch of furniture for his new apartment using sturdy FedEx boxes. If anything, it was a nice little advertisement for the quality of FedEx boxes. FedEx lawyers, on the other hand, saw otherwise. They sent him a takedown notice, somehow believing that the site infringed on the DMCA -- a law that has been misused more times than some of us can count. Luckily, the smart folks at the Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society agreed to take his case. They pointed out, quite correctly, that this case has nothing to do with copyright, and so the DMCA doesn't even remotely apply (mis-applied or not). If anything it's a trademark issue -- and even that is a weak claim. Would anyone going to the site actually think that it was FedEx's site? FedEx also claimed that this use of the boxes violated their terms of service, but as the folks at Stanford pointed out, there doesn't appear to be anything in the terms of service that prevents making furniture out of the boxes. This is another case where corporate lawyers completely overreacted to any use of their company's name. FedEx easily could have left this guy alone -- or, even better, encouraged him. It would have made for a great, amusing, advertisement for FedEx. Instead, they look like a bunch of bullies.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    dorpus, 11 Aug 2005 @ 9:59am

    Are Stem Cells Intellectual Property?

    Will Bush's Goons go after clinics in Tokyo offering injections of fetal placenta to "beat summer fatigue"?

    They're also offering injections of raw garlic and Vitamin C, so you can feel like Superman afterwards.

    http://gendai.net/contents.asp?c=051&id=16088

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Loudsound, 11 Aug 2005 @ 3:30pm

    I posted this to the FedEx complaints site

    Comments: I will write this with a very slim belief that it will get to anyone of importance. I jsut got done readin and research and article concerning FedEx and your recent handling of a internet legal matter. I can say in no unequivical terms that this was handled just about as poorly as possible in this day and age. Please do not try and justify it to me or have your lawyer-mongers seek spiteful retribution upon me either. Specifically this concerns the gentleman who was making furniture from your boxes. A humorous and a slice of the internet that makes web surfing interesting. Yet in with some perverse wisdom that only lawyers possess and managers listen to, FedEx deemed this man corporate enemy #1. I canoot impress upon you how foul and disgusting this makes FedEx look in the public eye. Again do not try and defend this - it cannot be done. It simply was the wrong thing to do. Where you could have used this as a viral marketing tool or promotion (some kind of!
    contest perhaps? FedEx shipping giveaways?) you instead have taken the action that will cingularly and certianly do the most damage to your corporate goodwill. I will be vocal as many other internet authors already are in voicing our disfavour with FedEx. I think I have made my point quite clear and I only hope in some moment of clarity you will listen to it. Please, have a meeting at some point after the froth of your heavy handed and goulish choice has died down. At this meeting look around the room and ask "Is FedEx better off for having threatened a man with a website, do our customers feel better about us, is our service better. Was the public backlash really worth all of this?" This may take some time as I can tell you internet denizens have precious little appetite for megalithic corporation and their salivating pack-hounds of lawyers working tirelessley to justify their own existence. I am no MBA, I am not even a manager, but as an educated and professional man I t!
    hink I know this: Making a non-operations choice that results in raisi
    ng the ire of the common public to levels of "hate" and alienating existing and future customers......just seems - plainly stupid. Those are my 2 cents on the matter - good luck.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Ivan Sick, 11 Aug 2005 @ 4:39pm

    No Subject Given

    They [FedEx] are probably worried that there will be a bunch of copycats. If 100,000 people see the site, and five percent of them decide to do the same thing, it could become expensive for them, since they distribute their boxes free (at least to account holders). Understandable, but really dumb.
    P.S. Mike, I cant believe you didn't bring up the Streisand effect again. You've been quite successful in propagating the term. First five Google hits either are Techdirt or refer to Techdirt. Much better than Dan Savage's "santorum" push. (Only the first hit). Good job!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Dourpus, 11 Aug 2005 @ 8:40pm

    Re: Are Stem Cells Intellectual Property?

    Thank God you posted that dorpus!


    Otherwise, I would not have known about FedEx and the tie to Stem Cells!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    bg, 12 Aug 2005 @ 6:17am

    FedEx missed the boat on that one...

    They could have made a good commercial out of the furniture site. Would have been funny... kinda like finding that speed talking guy and running him in several good commercials... What were they thinking?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Dorpus's Good Buddy, 13 Aug 2005 @ 12:56pm

    Dorpus smoking crack again

    Dorpus, I think you had one too many of your own injections.

    Either that or your medication is wearing off.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.