Now, We Wait

from the if-you-build-it-hopefully-they-will-come dept

Thu, Aug 11th 2005 12:48pm — Carlo Longino

A company that recently launched to sell average people's cameraphone photos to news outlets has signed up 1,200 potential paparazzi in a month -- but hasn't gotten any photos worth selling. This highlights one potential folly of citizen journalism efforts: they rely on (often untrained) citizen journalists. That's not to say that journalism is a high art to be practiced only the trained and experienced few, but any company looking to make money from everyday peoples' journalistic longings might want to invest in some training, too.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

4 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

jdw242, 11 Aug 2005 @ 1:39pm

oh god; c'mon!
camera phone pictures? WTF?
Would you buy a camera phone pic?
I wouldn't; my camera phone pics suck compared to my DSC-M1.

What did they (realistically) expect to happen?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 11 Aug 2005 @ 2:52pm
  
  Re: oh god; c'mon!
  well, sometimes even a cameraphone pic is better then nothin at all so they do have a potential money maker here. But lets face it, only in extreme situations like the problems in london last month when it wasnt even physically possible to get a trained camera man to the scenes. Most news items nowadays can easily have journos at the scene within mins so public pics are useless
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- sighs, 11 Aug 2005 @ 2:58pm
  
  Re: oh god; c'mon!
  I don't know where you live, but in the UK, when London got bombed at the beginning of July, all we saw for days on the news and in the papers were fuzzy cameraphone videos and equally low res snaps from smoke filled tube (sorry subway) tunnels and newly open top buses. You may scoff at the idea but half our police force is wading through gigabytes of this junk trying to find something useful to help fight the war on terror!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
dorpus, 11 Aug 2005 @ 3:26pm

Really Ugly People
News crews pick photo-genic people on the street for their articles. I remember that immediately after 9/11, there was a picture of an ugly Southeast Asian woman using her cell phone on the sidewalk near the WTC, but later editions sliced out that part of the picture. I've seen the same thing happen at other natural disaster coverage, where they edited out footage of people that looked too ugly.

[ link to this | view in chronology ]