Who Knew Online Maps Would Be Such A Big Deal?
Someone Finally Fighting Back Against RIAA Lawsuits In Court

Is It Illegal To Have Gambling Comment Spam In Australia?

Legal Issues

from the just-wondering... dept

Tue, Aug 16th 2005 2:36am — Mike Masnick
With the recent GEICO/Google ruling there are plenty of ongoing arguments about who should be responsible for the content of web ads. It's not hard to see how that can become quite the slippery slope. Down in Australia, for example, it appears that the law says that any site that advertises gambling links is breaking the law, if the site is primarily viewed by Australians. The article here focuses on how Google Australia is likely breaking that law, but it still doesn't address the question of why Google should be responsible for these ads when they have an open system for creating the ads. In fact, from the sound of this, an Australian blog that gets gambling comment spam would also be guilty of breaking this law. Shouldn't the responsibility go to the company or individual that's actually doing the advertising or spamming?
5 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    anonymous, 16 Aug 2005 @ 5:36am

    Aggree

    The fact that google remains to be a great search engine but how can they be held responsible for actions of others when there are thousands of websites being created weekly maybe daily. No one company can filter all that.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Kevin Mesiab, 16 Aug 2005 @ 9:21am

      Statism

      I think these kinds of rulings are clear indications that there is a huge disconnect between legislative bodies and the rapidly evolving internet paradigm.

      If we're not careful, we will quickly lose the laissez faire notions that built it up, under the thumb of poorly informed, reactionary bodies who we ask to govern us.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Derek Bever, 16 Aug 2005 @ 10:17am

    Jurisdiction...

    The trouble with enforcing laws on the internet that are specific to a country is that it's impossible for someone to actually have jurisdiction unless the site is hosted in that country.

    So either we make it illegal for australians to view the ads, thus placing the blame on the people, we make it illegal for a website whose traffic is primarily australian to display the ads, placing the blame on the people, or go after those doing the advertising, which is still a little out there considering they don't hand-place the ads.


    Basically, it's a stupid law.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      sia, 16 Aug 2005 @ 12:38pm

      Re: Jurisdiction...

      "Google's closest competitor in Australia, Yahoo.com.au, displays search results for gambling sites but not advertisements."

      So if Yahoo can do it, why can't other companies?
      Ya, thats what I thought!

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    SEO training noida, 2 Dec 2011 @ 9:41pm

    seo training

    Thank You

    Your blog is very informative

    visit:

    www.finnjobs.com ,(SEO Training Noida)

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]


Who Knew Online Maps Would Be Such A Big Deal?
Someone Finally Fighting Back Against RIAA Lawsuits In Court
Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

Friday

19:39 Important Announcement: Techdirt Is Migrating To A New Platform (0)
More arrow

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.