No Free Speech In Advertising When It Comes To The Olympics
from the you-must-pay-up-first dept
Ah, the Olympics. While many people think of great sporting events, increasingly, it seems that the Olympics is becoming associated with heavy handed attempts to stop anyone from mentioning the Olympics without paying up first. A few years ago, the US Olympics committee went cease-and-desist happy by threatening anyone who used the word "Olympics" even if it was clear that the event was separate from the real Olympics. Then, at last year's Athens Olympics, various radio stations were forced to turn off their regular internet streams because they had only paid for the radio rights, and not coughed up even more money for the internet radio rights. Then, athletes were told that they were not allowed to write about the Olympics on their own websites, as that might take away from the media companies that had paid to cover the Olympics. So, the latest news, submitted by John, is that over in the UK, a bill is being proposed that would make it illegal for an advertiser to mention the Olympics or use imagery related to the Olympics unless they were an official sponsor. This isn't about trademark violations, which would be covered by existing law -- but about specifically banning any reference to the games. Non-sponsoring advertisers could not use any combination of the following words: "games", "medals", "gold", "2012", "sponsor" or "summer" in any ads. The Olympics claims they need to do this to "protect" their sponsors -- but it's unclear why they deserve any kind of special protection. It's just yet another case of people misusing intellectual property for their own short-term benefit. In this case, all it will serve to do is make the Olympics that much less interesting.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Agreed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Patent Nonsense
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
0Iymp1c Hopefuls?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 0Iymp1c Hopefuls?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 0Iymp1c Hopefuls?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
What next? A multi-billion dollar Boy Scouts Corporation? How about a for-profit(-ONLY!) United Nation Inc and its wholly owned subsidiary UNESCO Ltd?
May be a Religion Inc which buys out Catholicism,Islam,Hinduism and Buddhism is not a bad idea.
I am also for a Global Government Inc. headed by Dubya which will go on a buying spree, buying up all other governments. May work out to be cheaper than waging wars.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
“Boycott” “riot” and “protest”
It is funny that they didn’t also try to ban the use of some other words - “Boycott” “riot” and “protest” all come to mind as relevant and likely consequences.
Bow down before the one you serve, you’re going to get what you deserve.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unbelievable
This world is starting to resemble a Douglas Adams novel more and more every day. Where's my towel?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You Better know where you towel is.
Or at least in the judicial since. These are the same guys who say if you want your CD in a MP3 format you have to buy both formats don't use your computer to rip the CD into a MP3.
Whats next? Animals sueing people??????
You hit a Cat with your car and next thing you know you are having to pay some society of cats money because of wrongfulld death???
Where is my electronic thumb, it's time to get off this rock.
Again: Brithish people = Great, Judicial systems of the world = brain dead zombies who haven't changed mentally since grade school.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]