Email-Stealing AOL Employee Finally Sentenced

from the lock-him-up dept

Last December, we reported how a judge refused to accept a plea bargain from an ex-AOL employee that had stolen 92 million screen names and email addresses and sold them to spammers, because he wasn't sure a crime had been committed. The plea was finally accepted and this week, the employee was sentenced to spend a year and three months in jail and pay $84,000 in restitution. The list that was sold included info on all of the company's 30 million users, and is reportedly still in circulation today. The irony here is that the judge said he cancelled his AOL account because he got too much spam -- but apparently prosecutors' original wording of the crime as a violation of the CAN SPAM act wasn't clear enough.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Aug 2005 @ 3:39pm

    No Subject Given

    What a pathetically light sentence. His fine should be 200% of the revenue he received. If he has to sell his home to pay it, then so be it.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    J, 17 Aug 2005 @ 6:47pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    I agree, we need to make it UNPROFITABLE for spammers. That is the only incentive for them to quit.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Carlo, 17 Aug 2005 @ 8:33pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    Actually, the restitution he has to pay is equal to three times what he received for the addresses -- which makes him seem doubly stupid.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.