USA Today Notices That People Have Scanners And Printers

from the will-you-look-at-that! dept

I remember reading stories more than a decade ago about how cheap, but high quality, scanners and printers were making it easier than ever for anyone to create counterfeit money. So, it's not clear at all why USA Today suddenly thinks it's newsworthy that the same thing is true today. Nothing has really changed. In fact, buried in the article (between anecdotes concerning what a large and growing problem this is) is the stat that "the amount of fake cash produced, seized and passed has remained stable in recent years." So, basically, nothing at all has changed? Yet, despite that, the rest of the story makes it sound like this is a rapidly growing problem, citing a few anecdotes to suggest that this has taken off recently due to technology that has been cheap and available for years.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    gungla, 18 Aug 2005 @ 11:37am

    No Subject Given

    Reading USA Today for 'news' is like eat at McDonald's for good beef.
    Come on, Mike. USA Today's purpose in life is to fill the 'news hole' with advertisements, and pointless simple stories which their readership can read and comprehend. Isn't USA Today written for a very low grade-school reading level?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    JBB, 18 Aug 2005 @ 11:48am

    Re: No Subject Given

    ITYM 'from' not 'for' in the last sentence.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    COD, 18 Aug 2005 @ 12:30pm

    No Subject Given

    President Bush is at the ranch, Congress is out of session - it's a slow news month, so we get filler material.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    dj jewelz, 18 Aug 2005 @ 12:33pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    Someone has to put out a newspaper that GWB can read and comprehend...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Meh, 18 Aug 2005 @ 1:45pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    Yeah the one for liberals was published for almost 40 years. Pravda had a huge readership.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    DGK12, 18 Aug 2005 @ 3:52pm

    New Scanner Technology

    One could say that they do this just to remind people... but personally I think the title sticks.

    What we used to call News has been on the decline for years, and has been replaced with repetitive garble being recycled for the next generation (which is lucky to even know how to read), but thats assuming they do read. And thats assuming too much.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Aug 2005 @ 10:07am

    Re: No Subject Given

    Oh yes, Meh, the standard 'liberals are communists' charge. Yawn.
    Please note the lack of rebuttal, not to mention evidence, that GW has a comprehension level above the typical USA Today article.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Aug 2005 @ 3:48pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    "Please note the lack of rebuttal, not to mention evidence, that GW has a comprehension level above the typical USA Today article."

    Remember, he is a creationist. Not the brightest guy in the world.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Vajzovic Safet, 17 May 2006 @ 10:30am

    counterfeit

    Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

    ich habe ein System (WMO) entwickelt mit dem man Geldscheine auf die Echtheit prüfen kann, und somit Kriminal bezogen auf das Bargeld, Falschgeld auf Minimum, fast Null, reduzieren kann. Hiermit möchte ich Sie höflich fragen ob Sie für so eine Erfindung Interesse haben und ob Sie veranlaßen können das sich die zuständige Läute mit mir in Verbindung setzen.

    Hochachtungsvoll

    Safet Vajzovic

    Moser 4
    88267 Vogt
    Germany
    Tel.: +49 751 506 9448
    Mobil: +49 175 69 67 225

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.