Why Stop BugMeNot?
from the please-explain-the-logic dept
With newspapers increasingly seeing how the web helps them make money, you'd think they'd want more visitors, not fewer. That's why I've never quite understood registration only websites that consistently go through and weed out any BugMeNot logins. However, it looks like the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the site that just realized charging for content doesn't make sense, has come up with another way to stop BugMeNot logins. Instead of just requiring your email and password, they require your name as a third field. I've definitely seen other sites swap these two, so that all the BugMeNot entries that are set with usernames, and not email addresses, no longer work. Either way, all this does is piss off potential readers who won't bother going back and certainly won't send any more readers to the site. And, of course, for those few who actually do go through the registration process, you can bet they're going to give dirty data which is worse than useless in that it compromises the whole set of aggregate data the newspaper was trying to put together in the first place. Users don't feel they're getting anything of value in exchange for giving up their data and will often just go elsewhere.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Regester only websites
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Regester only websites
I still regularly bail out of sites because whatever they offer is not worth the hassle or spam. If sites have positive info that is worthwhile user will flock there.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No clue how powerful email marketing is
So, when you don't want to give away your articles on the web because you want subscribers to your paper, you have to do more than just put up banners. Capture emails (even if a large percentage ARE bogus) and start using those contacts to get buyers for other products.
If a small ecommerce site I run can make $140,000 a year selling a single book product to our double opt-in mailing list of around 2000, I'm sure one of the larger news aggregates can make a lot more money selling through their email lists of millions.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not really new news
So this is nothing new at all.
Bugmenot has always been able to handle it just fine anyway. Always at least one valid login that worked.
That said, I got tired of outages where Bugmenot just would not work for any site or broke with every new Firefox update so I signed up for my own AJC account and attached it to a spam trap email address. I have yet to receive a single spam at that account.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Regester only websites
BTW, I did give real info to the NYT. Just did. But it's from my own domain so I can kill the email acct if it gets spammed to excess. So far, it has appears to have added maybe 3-5 incoming spams a day at most, no big deal yet.
Finally, in defense of paper newspapers: I can just pull out the crossword page and stick it in my briefcase. That's really convenient.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Newspapers and registration
That said, the company I work for is one of several that is looking at creating "soft thresholds" for content-access registration, which would allow up to x number of unregistered content views per y period. That would allow the site grazers and drive-bys to come on in, and would spur a sign-in/sign-up prompt only for extended sessions -- many of whose originators already are registered.
Soft thresholds should virtually eliminate the need for a BugMeNot, improve the quality of our consumer profile databases, and still allow us to gather the metrics we and our advertisers need.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bad data? Surely not.
Anony Mouse
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington, DC 20500
202-456-1414
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why Stop BugMeNot
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Underminding http://www.ajc.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]