Plans For NYC Subway Cell Network Move Ahead

from the can-you-hear-me-now dept

Thu, Aug 25th 2005 1:51pm — Carlo Longino

Despite ongoing security concerns, the Metropolitan Transit Authority is forging ahead with plans to blanket the New York City subway system with cellular coverage. The MTA is now soliciting bid for a 10-year exclusive contract which requires the winner to allow other carriers access to the network -- which will generate roaming fees for the winner, but could also become a significant competitive advantage for some carriers, given the multiple, non-interoperable standards in use in the US. The MTA doesn't appear overly concerned that the networks will be a threat to security, though they do say the network must be able to be shut down in emergencies. While there is a possibility a network like this could be used by a terrorist, not having cellular coverage in the subway won't stop a determined attacker. To not build or shut down underground networks because of security concerns is to ignore the safety and security benefits they can offer as well.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

4 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Jimmy Thomas, 25 Aug 2005 @ 2:26pm

Right..
They said the terrorists didn't win. They said we wouldn't change our lifestyle. I guess they've won afterall.

"They're whole mission is to disrupt our way of life! But it won't happen!"

.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ivan Sick, 25 Aug 2005 @ 8:04pm

No Subject Given
Forgive me if I'm missing something here...how can cutting the signal in an emergency possibly increase security? Is the terrorist who just bombed the train going to call his fellow terrorists and tell them "mission accomplished" or "come pick me up"? Or if they cut the power, "now's the time"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2005 @ 7:58am
  
  Re: No Subject Given
  So... if you read the article, you would have come across the following:
  
  "The authority's request for proposals requires that any winner block all calls to and from the network "under certain security conditions,""
  
  What that means is that they would like to be able to disable the network when they have information of a credible threat, or, perhaps, at a certain alert level or what have you. It did not say that they want to be able to turn it off in an emergency.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Aaron de Oliveira (profile), 26 Aug 2005 @ 8:37am
    
    Re: No Subject Given
    All in all, I think having a cell network in subways would be more safe, not less. Having all those eyeballs be able to report accidents, crimes and suspicions would make things a lot safer and a lot harder for any would be terrorist trying to sneak something on the subway.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]