Wal-Mart Jumps Into The Copyright Question Concerning Photo Reprinting

from the orphan-works,-indeed dept

Earlier this year, there was a lot of talk following a few news stories about various photo processing locations that were refusing to make prints of photos that "looked too good" for fear that they could be violating copyright. It was a silly situation, where people couldn't get new prints made of their own photos if they happened to have actually taken a decent shot. Well, now, it appears that Wal-Mart is trying to do something about that (if ever so slightly). They're taking part in a discussion about how "orphan works" should be dealt with. These are works where the owner of the copyright is unknown or unreachable. Wal-Mart is saying that this could apply to certain photographs as well -- and if the law is changed, it could allow them to more easily print such photos without fear of breaking copyright law.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    DGK12, 7 Sep 2005 @ 1:25pm

    Mad Skillz

    It was bound to happen. Why in modern times a person mustn't think or be capable in any palpable manor.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Eponymous Cowherd, 7 Sep 2005 @ 1:52pm

    Ask for a release form

    The procedure is to ask for the manager and then ask for a release form, indicating that you release W*M from liability. Or use CostCo or one of the online services where they don't question your honesty.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous, 7 Sep 2005 @ 6:41pm

    Re: Ask for a release form

    The problem is that W*M's policy in regards to releases are that they do not protect them from a (c) holder's legal recourse. And it has happened when down-on-their-finances photographers have entrapped and successfully sued places like W*M for (c) reproduction. Just a thought.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous of Course, 8 Sep 2005 @ 12:12pm

    more of blaming the tool and not who wields it.

    Walmart and the photo copying centers are on the wrong track. The copyright liability should be on the person requesting the copy. You don't blame a copier machine for an illegal copy. These photocopy centers are much like a copier machine but with a (sometimes) better user interface. The person operating the machinery should carry no responsibilty for anything but a good quality copy.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.