Why You Shouldn't Let The Press Photograph Your Credit Cards

from the just-saying... dept

Okay, while there's still no proof that any of today's cameraphones have been surreptitiously used to steal someone's credit card number, there is some evidence that holding up your Red Cross issued debit card to a news photographer might not be the smartest idea. A Hurricane Katrina victim received just such a debit card from the Red Cross, and held it up to an AFP photographer -- with the number clearly displayed. Apparently, soon after the photo was posted, the card's balance had dropped to zero, and plenty of cash advances and other purchases were attempted. It's not clear how quickly all of this happened. One report says minutes, another says eight hours, and doesn't list out the same list of frauds attempted on the card. Either way, if you're ever in that situation, perhaps you're better off keeping the numbers on the card to yourself.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Sep 2005 @ 6:15am

    similarly, dog-tags ought to be kept hidden...

    I made a similar statement regarding a cover-story in our local paper's Life section about a Vietnam Vet. The cover photo was of him holding his dog-tag up with his SSN clearly visible. I wrote the reporter and asked that he advise the man to put fraud watches on his credit accounts, etc., because the story could very easily compromise his identity -- it did, afterall, give his name, and being a local paper it wasn't difficult to find his address, and with his SSN it would be all too easy to do any number of evil things. Poor sod never even suspected it.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Chomper, 26 Sep 2005 @ 7:10am

    No Subject Given

    Having worked for a newspaper and news agency, I would venture to say that someone f*cked up on the agency/news side. Someone should have used common sense and blocked those out.

    It's not far off to say that the person assumed that would happen or the photographer might have told them this.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      drkkgt, 26 Sep 2005 @ 8:22am

      Re: No Subject Given

      C'mon, why would they tell the poor guy. It would just be another story for them, how this poor sod had been ripped off. Damn newsies.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    James Moffitt, 26 Sep 2005 @ 8:11am

    You have got to be kidding me

    Are people REALLY that stupid?? I can not believe that someone would hold their debit card up for the world to see. LOL... Now what are they going to do for funds? I guess I have another question. How would someone do a POS transaction with the number on the card without a name, address, phone number etc?? That does not say very much for the vendors who are taking the money does it?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      meofcourse77, 26 Sep 2005 @ 8:45am

      Re: You have got to be kidding me

      Wendy's, Subway, Quizno's and many others don't even require a signature on the charges. I find that disturbing.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anon, 26 Sep 2005 @ 9:40am

        Re: You have got to be kidding me

        I don't find it too disturbing. First, these charges are for purchases under $20. Second, credit cards and even many debit cards have fraud protection now. BTW, it's Debit if you enter a PIN durring purchase, otherwise, it's covered under credit card protections.

        So, it's more trustworthy than cash. Someone steals my wallet, I rather have 50 credit cards in there than 50 $20 bills.

        The only ones really put at risk are those retailers. Once sold, and fraud found, they're left with no merchandize nor any money. It's not buyer beware, but seller beware.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        David McArthur, 26 Sep 2005 @ 9:42am

        Re: You have got to be kidding me

        And requiring a signature would be better in what way?

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 26 Sep 2005 @ 10:04am

        Re: You have got to be kidding me

        Under $25, no signature is required for any purchases.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 26 Sep 2005 @ 10:34am

        Re: You have got to be kidding me

        But even if you do go to a place that needs a signiture, they don't check it.
        http://www.zug.com/pranks/credit/

        When we were at a higher class resturant that gave bad service, my father put "jack the ripper" for his signiture, and no one said anything.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          ASK for ID, 27 Sep 2005 @ 8:21am

          A Good Idea


          Many years ago, I stopped signing ALL of my Debit & Credit cards. I started writing in indelible ink " Ask for ID "

          This way, if my wallet is lost or stolen, a signature really isn't an issue. My Driver's license ( ID ) is needed to complete the transactions.

          When merchants do not ask to see ID ( and I know they did not even glance @ the back of the card ) I promptly let the merchant know that this could have been a fraudulent transaction & that I am not liable.

          BTW ... this recently happended to me with a stolen Debit card used as credit with a fraudulent signature. The merchant is out the $$$, I am not.

          link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.